Pages: 1
Email marketing method, what is better?
(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)
Posted by: montyauto
Need your input, what is better:
As many as the emailer opted in for
or
As many as frequency of sending emails?
Posted by: clifton
Sorry Montyauto, I could not get very well your question. What do you mean by "As many as frequency of sending emails"?
Posted by: forwardone
I`m confused by it too.
I think the question relates to which is better - having a lot of people to send e-mails to on a periodic basis, as opposed to sending out e-mails more frequently but to a lower number of recipients.
I assume this is to a `safelist` of course.
Posted by: montyauto
Need your input, what is better:
As many as the emailer opted in for
or
As many as frequency of sending emails?
Posted by: clifton
Merged thrads. We still don't understand your question 
Posted by: Pete Berg
According to me as many as frequency of sending emails is much better then the opening of the emails,because we can send many at a time.
Posted by: addy999
I think the more the no. of people u send the mail better will be the results and dont think frequency matters much.
Posted by: golddust
Sending email is much like doing a direct mail to a "list"; about 1% will look at your ad unless you have a really catchy ad, then it could go as high as 5%.
Frequency does matter; it takes the average person many exposures (between 8 and 20+) to the same ad before they even notice.
This is well know in marketing facts.