Pages: 1

INTGold Vs CapitalEx

(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)

Posted by: edward

What's everyones opinions on this situation. Supposedly INTGold has frozen a few accounts because of a dispute. CapitalEX is claiming thay did not have the right to do this. There are rumors that CapitalEX is owned by GlobalVantage. This is a very fierce dispute over at Talkgold. Should be interesting how this one turns out. E-gold seems to be the one and only reliable e-currency.

What is everyones opinions on the matter?


Posted by: curly

I got the INTGOLD update which explains the situation. If what they wrote is true then they are perfectly within their rights to freeze accounts and refuse to let CapitalEx use their services.


Posted by: betrdanevr

I believe it's more than just a rumor about who owns CapitalEx.


Posted by: forwardone

I`m not with either (well I am with Intgold but never used them), but my `feeling` is that Intgold is the more reliable of the two. From what I have read over at TG there are just one or two stirring it for Intgold, whereas the vast majority are anti-Capitalex.

Geoff


Posted by: golddust

Global Vantage reports that it owns approximately 22% of Capitalex, however they are painting the picture that Capitalex has been wronged in a big way. I've heard that Capitalex is a scam by several sources. I suspect that C-ex is just trying to save their skin. Even many members on the GV forum are voicing doubt and concern, and those that invested have complained about their returns.
As for Intgold, well what have we learned in the past from dealings with Pool of Gold, now I-gold's payment processor? I have not had any trouble with Intgold or any of the supposed related HYIP programs. But POG in the mix makes me much more cautious.

golddust


Posted by: betrdanevr

Quote:
But POG in the mix makes me much more cautious

Isn't that the truth!!!

Does POG fund e-gold or any other currency? I can't remember. Makes me "nervioso" to say the least.

Terri


Posted by: Salty

gv is involved with icc pool (seems members r complaining TOOOOO low return), Cex, be-cash(?), etc. only read on its forum and in the electra project. the result for electra is also not promising and always delayed.

Juli is very good at writing and have good knowledge of the "hyip" arena. seems all progs are ponzies in his eyes. but at first he had a very high referral commission for his gv fund.

have no big problem with IG.
but there was a strange thing happened (possibly some other members also experienced this):
Once the ponzi DMN (now DMNG) paid duplicatedly to its members using IG, and wrote to members indicating this issue, also said members just keep the duplication. so i had an extra payment in my ig acct (less than $20?). the other day, when i logged to my ig acct again, the extra payment WAS GONE, and could find NOTHING in the payment history!

Its not a matter of the amount, but what IG did was VERY UNPROFESSIONAL!

Now its a critical time for IG. It doesnt have reverse payment policy. But it tries to get the money BACK already sent out(the issue with Cex)! So if someone's (hope that he is an "old" client of IG) IG fund was scammed, he could ask IG to get it back!

It seems not a bad thing, but have to be consisten with its policy!


Posted by: golddust

Many issues with GV - lack of project performance (delays...), low returns and unprofessional handling of very public problems with exchanges.
Likewise Intgold is raising its own red flags. Many people have drawn attention to the fact that numerous HYIPs only accept Int-g for payments, and that Int-g is involved in scamming.
It just took me more than a week to fund my Ingold card using POG as the processor for funds from Profit Wallet. PW admin was very helpful, but I never heard a thing from Int-g regarding the slow funding by POG.
I am not impressed with GV and Int-g. They both have become involved in compromising situations where "CYA" is the game.

golddust


Posted by: forwardone

It seems then that there`s some double standards here with IntGold. At the moment they are facing a lot of criticism for a number of reasons.

In response to a member in another forum who`d had their IntGold account closed, or suspended, this was posted by another member.
Quote:
OK, let's say for a moment you're telling the truth... Isn't PicPay the currency owned and operated by the PIPS HYIP??

If so then you indirectly broke IntGold's rule in their Terms & Conditions which gives them the right to close or take control of any account being used for HYIPs. In this case it's still derived from a currency closely associated with a leading HYIP.
Now, how can it be the case that IntGold doesn`t like HYIP`s when I know of quite a few HYIP`s that blatantly use and promote the fact that they use IntGold?

Geoff


Posted by: golddust

I'm with you on that interesting twist, Geoff.
In addition, those HYIPs that only take INTgold, always (IMO), turn out to be scams.

golddust


Posted by: betrdanevr

Well, I don't know why INT Gold has to get so high and mighty about not wanting to be in any way connected with hyip investments.

To my way of thinking, the kind of programs that they've accepted as "okay," I've never made a darn dime with, anyway!

Would someone puleeeeze raise their hand in here if they've ever made any money with, for example, the Web Stars Randomizer that I paid 30 smackers for a year ago and maybe $17 for "extra" rotation?

Granted, it may be my own personal laziness -- I DO prefer passive "investments" to marketing, but hey, that's just me. I think even with the scams and the ponzis, I'm way ahead with the hyips and "investing" <cough, cough> with e-gold.

Terri


Posted by: Cashier

Frist

www.paypalsucks.com

Secound

www.intgoldsucks.com

I wonder whosoe going to be next on that list

www.onlinecurrencysucks.com PERHAPS it's like a bug taking down e-currency one by one. it's getting crazy.....

logic seems ilogical itself.



eXTReMe Tracker