Pages: 1 2

Discuss PIPS/Pic-Pay Here.

(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)


Posted by: edward

Today I heard that the admin Bryan was thinking about shutting the forum down because of too many negative comments and "bashing". I took time to look at what the bashing was all about. It was basically a few people asking legitimate questions about how returns are made, etc. Then the whole forum would flip out and call them trolls.

Looks like this could be the begining of the end for pips. What are your thoughts.

Ed



Posted by: ydutil

I don't believe that PIPS is 100% legit, but I have just received 1 withdrawal last Thursday and another one today. So they are still paying. I don't think it's ready to fail yet.

Don't forget that there is a big convention in Hawaii in march which Bryan has already paid large amount to the Hilton. If he would really want to bail out with the most money he would wait after the Hawaii convention when everyone is all confident, compounding and investing more.



Posted by: mirico

not -in some respect legit? How do you scam people for 2 years?
I have read testimonials where people are taking out 40-50k etc.

Where is the scam portion?

mirico



Posted by: edward

Paying people $40K is nothing when you have $750 million invested in your program.

Other HYIPs have lasted just as long as pips, and ended as scams. It's not something we have not seen.



Posted by: alter1000

PIPS is not a scam, but it began as a common ponzi scheme.
The genius of the admin is to reinvest the ponzi's profits into REAL high yield businesses and ventures. So now it's not ONLY a ponzi ! But it's about 50% ponzi. So any lack of spends or compoundings will cause problems, not such as if it was only ponzi, but still severe. One day or the other, PIPS will be free from its former ponzi scheme. Will it survive till that day ?
Investing into PIPS, as into any other hyip, is a bet, just a bet !



Posted by: betrdanevr

I'm not in PIPS myself, but I find most of the people who shout "scam" to be extremely rude and to have an agenda. Legitimate questions, my foot. They're out to hijack threads and cause chaos.

You couldn't expect all detailed information about a program to be on the net. People with legitimate questions have a number to call and could even go to one of the meetings and meet Bryan. Many people have.

Though I hate scammers, I'm not sure if don't find scammer hunters more putrid. They generally hit the best of the programs because the best of the programs stay around long enough to *get hit.* The scammers are long gone.



Posted by: kakarukeys

Hi guys,

I am from Malaysia. If you want I can help you to check whether PIPS is indeed registered in Malaysia. But my opinion is, currently there is no legitimation in Malaysia that enables a company to collect fund from public besides listed in stock exchange.



Posted by: khoong25

I believe that is why Malaysians are not allowed to partipate. I do believe they are physically there and all, the office, the data center the bistro, but that does not mean anything!



Posted by: forwardone

As an individual I don`t have an account with PIPS, and whether or not it`s legit I just don`t know. (Just to clarify, I am with a small group who are, and I do have a very small amount invested).

My own observations about it from what I have read are mixed.

Some members absolutely love it, and have nothing bad to say at all. They have and are still being paid ok. Some have attended their meetings, met the owner, etc. etc.

Others seem to report difficulties in registering, getting their accounts straight, and withdrawals.

I have always maintained that for me it looks to be overly complicated to set up, it costs quite a lot of money to open up an account, and it does seem to get it`s fair share of problems, but probably no more than any other HYIP.

I doubt if I will ever join for the above reasons, and I do have my doubts about any program that suffers so much mixed publicity. There`s not too much that differentiates PIPS from any other program that`s come and gone.

To me a well run, honest, genuine program, whilst it`s not completely fair to compare to any offline program, shouldn`t have as many snags as PIPS keeps on having. And even if it is all of those things, the PicPay situation seems very shaky, which could determine PIPS outcome just as any other external influences might.

Geoff



Posted by: edward

I also find it troubling that they are censoring the forum. Some people seem to have legitimate questions asked yet members simply called them trolls and had mods delete their posts.

Withdrawals are delayed, Picpay is having all kinds of troubles, and Bryan is simply making claims which are not backed up by any dociments. I don't see a difference between PIps and the rest of the major ponzi's like NL, EzBucks, etc.

Could this be another OSGold situation, where an HYIP runs it's own ecurrency only to be able to create it's own money, thus allowing the ponzi to continue for a much longer time?

Ed



Posted by: ydutil

Surprisingly, in the past 2 week, I received in my bank account many withdrawals that were pending, maybe the PICPAY staff is really getting back up...let's see if it last



Posted by: hunkabc

Edward, you always seem to be wise and forward-seeing. Have you ever met any hyip admin before or even have seen their pictures?






Quote:
Originally Posted by edward
I also find it troubling that they are censoring the forum. Some people seem to have legitimate questions asked yet members simply called them trolls and had mods delete their posts.

Withdrawals are delayed, Picpay is having all kinds of troubles, and Bryan is simply making claims which are not backed up by any dociments. I don't see a difference between PIps and the rest of the major ponzi's like NL, EzBucks, etc.

Could this be another OSGold situation, where an HYIP runs it's own ecurrency only to be able to create it's own money, thus allowing the ponzi to continue for a much longer time?

Ed




Posted by: edward

Personally no, simply because I don't bother to. I do know over a dozen people who did meet William of Nova-Lights. Shortly after the program closed.

Ed



Posted by: betrdanevr

Good for you, Yuditl!

Sounds like maybe they're rising to the occasion. And adding forum moderators isn't a bad idea at all!

I am not much for naysayers and non-members being admitted to program forums, but if they do come in and want to ask questions, they should do so in a civil fashion instead of out to prove that a program is a scam. I, for one, think they should be summarily booted!

But as I say, I'm not in PIPS. I shouldn't really care, I suppose, but I know lots of people in it and some are very good friends.

I hope it lasts a long time! Long enough for me to get in too. :-)

I did notice that Bryan says he's never claimed that PIPS has SEC approval and he says they don't need SEC approval. (Lord knows the last time I put money in anything that had SEC approval. Oh, yes, I do: Sharebuilder! )



Posted by: forwardone

Terri, love the Sig, is it new or have I just not noticed till now?

Quote:
I am not a complete idiot. (I'm just not finished!)

ps. That makes two of us!

Geoff



Posted by: betrdanevr

LOL It's a new sig, Geoff. You haven't missed a thing. :-)

Getting "finished" could take us awhile, eh?



Posted by: kakarukeys

See
http://forum.pipsinc.com/phpBB2/vie...a+labuan+panama

According to them, some bodies of PIPS are registered in Malaysia, Labuan
I checked with Companies Commission of Malaysia, NO SUCH COMPANY EXISTS.



Posted by: forwardone

Quote:
I checked with Companies Commission of Malaysia, NO SUCH COMPANY EXISTS.
Interesting!


Geoff



Posted by: kakarukeys

HOLD ON.
LET ME TEMPORARILY WITHDRAW THE CONCLUSION

The commission has informed me they have found companies with the names registered.
But NOT IN THE STATE LABUAN.
And the date of registration is quite recent.

More info will come



Posted by: kakarukeys

PIPS Financial - NO SUCH COMPANY EXISTS (whether Labuan or other states)

PIC Capital - NO SUCH COMPANY EXISTS (whether Labuan or other states)

PIC Realty - NO SUCH COMPANY EXISTS (whether Labuan or other states)

PICPAY - NO SUCH COMPANY EXISTS (whether Labuan or other states) ?!?!
I double-confirmed with them, yes no such company exists.

PIPS Fashion - NO SUCH COMPANY EXISTS (whether Labuan or other states)

PIPS Bistro -
1 663467-A PIPS BISTRO SDN. BHD. N ACTIVE 20-08-2004 F3/1,LUCKY PLAZA;JLN DATO'LEE FONG YEE;SEREMBAN;N.SEMBILAN 70000

PIPS Foundation - NO SUCH COMPANY EXISTS (whether Labuan or other states)

New Mark Business System - NO SUCH COMPANY EXISTS (whether Labuan or other states)

Any company name contaning the term Pureinvestor - NO SUCH COMPANY EXISTS (whether Labuan or other states)



Posted by: forwardone

It looks as though you`ve done quite a bit of work there, kakarukeys.

It certainly raises a few questions.

Geoff



Posted by: adren

Kakarukeys, you called commission office and/or got their reply in written form?

I found goverment site http://www.ssm.gov.my/findroc.htm (COMPANIES COMMISSION OF MALAYSIA) and when you insert company name you will get results. I inserted PIC Realty, PIC Capital, PICPAY as example and found these companies EXIST and ARE REGISTETRED ! Also there is a link to license to PIC Trust – Incorporated in New Zealand and I am not sure at this moment but also I saw online Panama license.

Kakarukeys please call again this guy from Commisision how it si possible he or she say companies doesn exist but when you check online their site we see they exist ?! Who is responsible for this confusion ?







Posted by: kakarukeys

I see that they have a website, I wasted a few bucks.
OK basically, All of the companies are found to be registered, but not in the Labuan state am I right?
That guy must be sleeping when I wanted him to check database of all states in Malaysia for all companies name, but he only checked one name.
Now is after office hour in Malaysia, I will try again tomorrow.

I'm sorry for this, now you have your worries relieved?



Posted by: edward

Don't they claim to be registered in Liberia or something now?


Ed



Posted by: Salty

I have watched PIPS for over 6 months.

The problem is that all the "tiny" problems existed with all the systems, and seems from the VERY BEGINNING up to now! And also their poor support!

Maybe PIPS has some incredients of a ponzi scheme, but its still the most transparent and also profitable prog out there.

If you have some confidence, then its the BEST time to join! You can buy picpay and get extra 20% with EG.

We all lost much, maybe this $450 can earn you back some!



Posted by: karin_brenig

If you believe PIPS will make it thru another 4.5 months - just do it.

Planning your re-investment schedule correctly, you will have your initial deposit back within about 14 weeks - and from then on you can just enjoy your free ride.



Posted by: honey

I can´t understand why are you against pips. I am member of this company since long time and am very happy. You can´t believe if i tell you my daily roi.
Should Bryan show you all his documents? If you don´t like pips just keep quiet, let us enjoy who really found our last distination.
honey



Posted by: Cyber_Hegner

Hmmmmm......whoopps!!!



Posted by: max123

I've got no problems with PIPS too... this one is steady paying, one problemo is delaying withdrawals. I'm in profit with them so let's see how they performing next year



Posted by: forwardone

Quote:
one problemo is delaying withdrawals.

But why should there be any delays in payments?

Geoff



Posted by: krille74

http://forum.pipsinc.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=25839





Posted by: max123

Quote:
Originally Posted by forwardone
But why should there be any delays in payments?

Geoff
I think delays are their main problem. They manually doing a big job, their personal is not so qualified to do this job. Their CEO said that they are going to make withdrawals faster. As for me currently I'm waiting about 3 weeks for DC withdrawal. But I'm satisfied with PIPS!



Posted by: edward

There are numerous complaints about delayed withdrawals. Is it possible that this could be the beginning of the end? Maybe they are delaying withdrawals on purpose so that they don't have to pay out as much since deposits are decreasing.

Now they are launching a 3% program. Could this be to induce more spends?

What are your opinions?



Posted by: max123

Quote:
Originally Posted by edward
There are numerous complaints about delayed withdrawals. Is it possible that this could be the beginning of the end? Maybe they are delaying withdrawals on purpose so that they don't have to pay out as much since deposits are decreasing.

Now they are launching a 3% program. Could this be to induce more spends?

What are your opinions?
I do not think PIPS needs any advertisement. If someone not going to be a member, simply stay off & watch. Sadly there are some trolls getting everyday ROI & screaming that PIPS is a SCAM. This is very bad. Too bad to print here...
I'm totally satisfied with PIPS, friends of mine too... I've got much more than deposited in June. DC & wires working with 3-4 weeks delays. Why can't you simply wait 3 weeks to see your money? I've got two $500 withdrawals (one yesterday & one today) from picpay DC card. It is really working.



Posted by: forwardone

What is the latest `announcement` to come out of PIPS going to do for the program? Is it a backward step, or is it necessary to forestall problems ahead?

Quote:
Hello Everyone,

Now I know what I am about to say will cause some eyebrow lifting and possibly concerns. But on the other hand this action is out of grave company concerns.

As of today all sponsor commissions/bonuses will cease. No further signup commissions or monthly commissions will be paid and the continuance of existing commissions will also cease.

The ultimate reason for this decision is that it has caused and continues to cause problems with associate groups, internet regulators and other regulatory bodies.

There is an ever increasing number of unaurthorised websites and websites that do not remain current. The information on many websites is outdated and many contain inaccurate and false information. Because the majority of sites use our name we are under constant review and are being held responsible for these sites. Spamming issues are incredible and we have even been asked to terminate associate accounts. We would also ask that all sites that refer to PI or PIPS be dismantled for the continued best interest of the company.

We will not be placed in a compromising position when the benifits of what we do are so great, to more than just individuals. Collectively we are all benefiting from PIPS and to compromise these beneifits for something less significant would not be considered a good investment.

I thank your for your continued support and your understaning on this issue.
_________________
Regards,
Gary.
Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

Comments in a month old British newspaper article have resurfaced in discussions recently.

Now I`ve no axe to grind here, just reporting what I`ve read, and this particular article is new to me, and may be to some of you too. And, no, I don`t believe everything I read in a newspaper either.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/guardian_...1370962,00.html

Geoff



Posted by: betrdanevr

Yeah, I've read this recently as well.

And I'm not informed enough to talk about the viability or reliability of PIPS nor the honesty of Marsden, but the part I've quoted from this article is one reportedly one of the reasons he's stopped referral commissions.

People get really reckless when they get greedy and they're out to make a buck, IMHO.


Quote:

According to one PIPS website operated by Gary Westoby of Oregon, US: "Your funds are secure. It is licenced by the government".





Posted by: max123

my dc withdrawal from dec, 6 completed yesterday seems all dc withdrawals till Dec, 13 were processed

PIPS ROCKS!



Posted by: kakarukeys

sorry for the mistakes.
yes PIPS have branch companies registered in Malaysia.

Here is an old news:
http://www.foodvenue.com/content/ne...PIPS_Bistro.asp

2% payout is very hard to maintain for a long term.
I believe sooner or later they will have to decrease it, otherwise it will look suspicious.



Posted by: forwardone

This is a reply a member of TG gave when asked why he was willing to sell Picpay at a discount.

Are these figures real? Is this the experience of many members with delays in withdrawals of months?

Quote:
Yes, there's lots of people getting excited that their 'pending' withdrawal of 3 months has changed to 'approved' but that doesn't mean that they are getting the money.

I personally have a wire 'pending' from the end of November, to the value of $1800, I have another one from January for $1500. Do I expect to see them? Forgive me if my answer is on the negative side.

Therefore, it seems that my only option (at the moment) to get real, cold hard cash from PIPS, is to sell the e-currency at a vastly reduced price. My offer will stand until I receive either of the bank wires or PIPS closes.

ace
Geoff



Posted by: screamfine

YES - it's true: PIPS has problems with the withdrawls at the moment!
NO - PIPS won't close.

PIPS works fine for me. If you want to get your money out of PIPS simply change your picpay credits into real cash with other members or people who want to join PIPS ...

where is the prob!???!

Also PIPS is working on that withdrawl problem ... all they need is a bit more time.

I'm still investing - every single month...



Posted by: kakarukeys

They are blaming the bank and the web host.

Quote:
Hi,

As you are all aware, withdrawals and both deposits are rather delayed
compared to the time frame in the past.

We are currently using a temporary bank account (EON BANK) to manage our
transactions. However, this bank is not able to move in full swing due to
lower administrative capabilities and is not able to cope with our volume
of transactions for both withdrawal and deposit.

Wire withdrawals has been released till Dec 2 and debit card withdrawal
released till Dec 20. Check withdrawal is moving at its normal pace taking
about 5-6 weeks to receive from date requested. Approved checks are not
necessarily sent out. Your checks will be sent out within 10 days of date
approved. To-date, checks requested till Dec 14 (partly) has been sent
out. Wire withdrawal that has been approved is also taking time to be
actually credited into your bank account.

For deposits, it is taking approximately about 2-3 weeks for the deposit
to actually be credited into our bank account - again due to the reason
stated above. Of course you need to ensure that you have faxed us the bank
wire deposit to picpay at 606-8500827 in order for us to trace for your
deposit with our account statement. Credit Card deposit is currently
offline and will be available in the near future. You can also opt to do a
check deposit and this will be approved only when the funds clear in our
bank account.

https://picpay.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3014

https://picpay.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3135

Please do understand that we supports together with the management are
doing our level best to settle all intermediary related issues as soon as
possible. We are not deliberately delaying and we have no joy in your
sufferings. We do share and sense all your worries, concern, anger,
frustration, impatience, doubt and all other emotions that are expressed
to us. But believe us, WE ARE WORKING ON RESOLVING ALL ISSUES.

The new bank account will be available in the very near future together
with the credit card deposit option. So, please do hang in there and give
us your full co-operation. We have proved our good business records in the
past and are hoping to continue doing so when issues are fully dealt with.

As for your login problem to picpay site, we are having some bandwidth
problem and are liaising with the telecommunication company to resolve
this. This is 3rd party that we are dealing with and hence the delay.

https://picpay.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3427

HOPE WE CAN HAVE SOME CO-OPERATION FROM ALL OF YOU

With regards,
Elizabeth Rosalind
Picpay.Com




Posted by: forwardone

This might, or might not, be of some comfort to any Pipsters having any of the problems described in this reply I saw over at TG.
Quote:
the main PIPS database (Oracle, big mistake!) crashed somewhere on February 4th.
The recovery took them almost a week, and they had to use a backup copy
from January 31st,
probably because that was the last point in time where they had PIPS and PICPAY synchronized.

Meaning: all PIPS or PICPAY transactions between January 31st. and February 5th
were reverted (undone).
If you opened a new PIPS account you will have to do that again.
If you transferred money between PICPAY accounts or PIPS and PICPAY,
you'll have to do that again.

If you funded a PICPAY account from some *outside* source, like bankwire
or check or money order, you'll have to call PICPAY with proof of your
transaction.
Geoff



Posted by: betrdanevr

Like they really "need" more paperwork to do???

I'm in a PIPS pool and quite ecstatic that I don't have to personally deal with these withdrawal issues, for sure!!

One thing I've always wondered about, and maybe somebody can enlighten me. Say that I owned the bank and I had PIPS as a customer, if they wanted to make hundreds of wires a day and I only had two staff members and they could only do 50 per day. The bank charges that customer a nice fee for those wires, right? Wouldn't it stand to reason that the bank would hire some more people in their wire transfer department in order to generate those fees???



Posted by: golddust

I agree with the wisdom of your logic. . . but c'ha know, banks are very conservative and they don't like to work too hard. Also, there may be a limit as to the # of wires a bank can manage in one day, no matter how many workers there are.

Just guessing about that. . .



Posted by: jaukki

Quote:
Originally Posted by golddust
I agree with the wisdom of your logic. . . but c'ha know, banks are very conservative and they don't like to work too hard. Also, there may be a limit as to the # of wires a bank can manage in one day, no matter how many workers there are.

Just guessing about that. . .
With that logic big companies would also be few months behind in paying the salaries to their employees...

As far as i know most banks offer solutions to pay thousands of wires in few seconds.... as long as there is money in the account.....
Oh well... maybe their bank only has some prehistoric system still in use... one with hand written bank books etc..



Posted by: golddust

. . . or no money in their account. . .



Posted by: forwardone

When asked to post if they were waiting for withdrawals, I saw this within the last few days in another forum,
Quote:

I still waits for 2 WT's

$5000 wire transferre made on 29 Dec

$2000 to Debitcard made on 2 Jan
Not looking too good.

Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

And on and on it goes........!

http://www.pips-sg.com/forum/viewto...509815a7a3199f8

Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

Well if I had any doubts that PIPS was a ponzi, this has helped to dispel them.

http://www.talkgold.com/forum/showt...?t=15338&page=1

Quote:
I just want to say, I don't appreciate people sending me bulk emails with threats in them because I host this folder at talkgold. If you don't like what is discussed here, then ignore it. There is no reason send me mass emails calling be a scammer and threatening me, simply because some members are saying PIPs may be a ponzi.

This is cult like activity and does not belong in the HYIP arena

Brian
Geoff



Posted by: candy

The owner of STI (Weblife rating page) has raised some questions about discrepancies in his PIP account. He feels the changes were made from inside PIP they insist it must be hackers.



Posted by: betrdanevr

How do you figure it proves anything other than there are some very ill-behaved PIPSters e-mailing Brian? That is, IF they are really PIPSters. You never know in this arena . . .

May be the same PIPSters who attacked GINSystem when it started, too.



Posted by: forwardone

Quote:
Originally Posted by betrdanevr
How do you figure it proves anything other than there are some very ill-behaved PIPSters e-mailing Brian? That is, IF they are really PIPSters. You never know in this arena . . .

May be the same PIPSters who attacked GINSystem when it started, too.

Yes, you are right, Terri. It could well have been over enthusiastic PIPS zealots, or of course it migh have been xxxx-stirrers.

Either way it detracts from the PIPS cause, and doesn`t exactly endear me to the program.

I do accept, however, that this type of behaviour doesn`t, in itself, prove that PIPS is a ponzi.

Geoff



Posted by: golddust

Warnii;;ang=========ll=[-ppppppppppp]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]=[================================================== ================================================== ================================================== ============================



Posted by: candy

The STI message is reported to have generated 400 replies with 100 claiming to have also experienced similar problems. This does not mean that PIP is a ponzi but it does indicate an internal malfunction that should be addressed by the admin.



Posted by: golddust

To the best of my conscious knowledge, I did not post the above gibberish. Is someone messing /hacking ?

At 3:04 am, I was asleep and not known to sleepwalk.

golddust



Posted by: forwardone

To the real `golddust.` I`m not too sure what`s gone on here, but I really thought it a strange post made in your name earlier.

I think the safest thing to do until we can find out what`s happened is to place a temporary `hold` on anyone using your username to post and we`ll get in touch with you.

Geoff



Posted by: golddust

Thanks for your help, Geoff.



Posted by: betrdanevr

Say it isn't so! Again??



Posted by: forwardone

Thread moved to Long-Term Paying Program folder.

Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

Some members are still complaining about very long delays in Picpay withdrawals. Is that the norm, or is several months delay unusual?

Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

On a personal level I`m not in PIPS, so maybe I`m missing something with them. BUT, if I had a legitimate business, whether on or offline, and I wanted to pass monies through the banking system mainly receiving from members and paying members out, WHY would I find it a struggle to find a bank to handle that business?

I would have thought that in most parts of the world banks are falling over themselves to get business, whether from private individuals or from businesses. So, how come Brian Marsden is having to globetrot to find banks to handle PIPS business? I suppose what I`m saying is are the banks reluctant because PIPS is basically an Internet business, or do the banks have genuine concerns over the integrity of the program?

Geoff



Posted by: betrdanevr

I've pondered these thoughts as well, Geoff, as I'm sure many others have.

Wouldn't surprise me if just about any bank might be a bit squeamish to an internet investment. Bankers are conservative types, you know. They could wonder what, if any, "exposure" they might create for themselves by association if they're feeling antsy about it.

And then, too, though, is the subject of "high maintanance" accounts such as PIPS and the thousands upon thousands of transactions. That might be a big consideration, as it may take a chunk of their bottom-line profit.

I really did wonder why the EON bank didn't hire more clerks to process wires. At $30 (estimate) a pop, that would certainly pay a salary or two. Maybe the holdup was more in the PIC Pay end of things. Certainly PIPS' manual account analysis upon a member's withdrawal request struck me as somewhat antiquated.

And I've wondered about the capacity of Malaysian banks in general and how they "stack up." That's something I'm very ignorant about. Maybe Malaysian members here could fill us in.

But with the Hawaii convention just starting, there may be some BIG NEWS to be announced and some heightened growth in spirit. I'm in a PIPS pool, and, myself aside, I'd just like to see the folks succeed and everybody come out a winner.



Posted by: forwardone

This looks like some good news coming out of Hawaii for Pipsters.

http://www.pips-usa.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=485

It should result in the speed of payments for it`s members. I too am in a PIPS Pool, Terri, (actually the same one as you I think) so I`d like to think that PIPS does have a future.

Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

An interesting discussion in the Success Team International forum regarding PIPS (which STI is invested in) especially relating to PIPS in Australia.

http://www.successteaminternational...topic.php?t=339

Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

Is a bank in Cambodia the best that Brian can come up with?

Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

It seems that some PIPSters are running scared of free comments about them. A post was made on their forum asking members to report TalkGold for spamming (which I`ve NEVER seen any evidence of).

Obviously someone want TG shut down so outspoken criticisms of PIPS will cease. What makes it worse is that the normally vigilant Mods there at PIPS haven`t taken any action to delete this member`s post. What does that suggest.......? For a so-called top Internet and offline company that`s not good ethics!

Quote:

This really aggravates me. They have all these strict rules about posting info of other sites, but when it comes to posting my personal details, and telling members to report me because people are talking about my site, they don't delete that. I hope the mods there do the right thing and remove this post, because the last thing I need is for some of those PIPs members to be giving me threatning phone calls.

Brian
Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

Since his original complaint about his details being on the PIPS Forum Brian has posted at TG to say that a family member of his received a threatening phone call intended for Brian.

PIPS is fast losing respect if it feels that it`s ethical to allow such matters as an Admin`s PERSONAL information to be posted on it`s site. Fortunately that post has since been removed, but should never have been allowed to remain there for as long as it did (around 10 hours).

Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

The talk now over at TG is about PIPS forum members being kicked out for mentioning TG in a positive way, or having TG in their signature. Here`s one such TG post.
Quote:
newpips2

Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2005 12:32 am Post subject: PIPs is a cult scam - FACT
This is ridiculous. I get ridculed and banned from this forum for having a link in my signature to talkgold.com.

I get yelled out for asking a small question about the program. I am a PIPs investor. I had planned on investing a large sum. Obviously something is not right if you aren't allowed to ask questions without being attacked.

Since I had a URL to talkgold in my signature, and it clearly does not break any rules, I get banned?

I want my money back from PIPs. This is obviously a cult like program, and you guys are being sucked into it. The moderators here remove any negative posts at all. Thus new members that come here only see the glamor and glory of this program. Obviously if Bryan was running a real program, he would welcome questions, and even negative comments. It's blatantly obvious that this is not a legit program. I have decided that if this post gets removed, I'm contacting the FBI, SEC, and various other agencies. I will make sure Bryan is sent to prison and any people who are supporting him by removing any negative comments.
Geoff



Posted by: netpro

Sounds like another troublemaker from TG posting on PIPS forum and not even a member of PIPS. I have been on TG forum for probably since it started and take what is posted on there with a grain-of-salt



Posted by: forwardone

It seems that there are a few people who are planning to sue Picpay if they don`t get their funds released soon. Do you think they`d have much chance of winning?

Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

Wire Transfers seem to be the latest cause for complaint against PicPay. Not only do they take a long time to action, but if there`s a problem with the request then members get financially penalised by PicPay, and the process starts all over again.

http://forum.pipsinc.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=40636

Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

Theories or facts about PIPS, and Bryan?

http://www.thinkfn.com/artigo_eng.php?id=130

Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

Legitimate or not this type of Government action can`t be good news for PIPS or it`s investors.

http://www.ssb.state.tx.us/orders/2005/1587.htm

Quote:
  1. Respondents are engaging in fraud in connection with the offer for sale of securities.
  2. Respondents have made an offer containing statements that are materially misleading or otherwise likely to deceive the public.
  3. Respondents’ conduct, acts, and practices threaten immediate and irreparable public harm.
  4. The foregoing violations constitute bases for the issuance of an Emergency Cease and Desist Order pursuant to Section 23-2 of the Texas Securities Act.
Geoff



Posted by: hashlie

Quote:
Originally Posted by forwardone
Theories or facts about PIPS, and Bryan?

http://www.thinkfn.com/artigo_eng.php?id=130

Geoff
Long detailed info re PIPS here;
http://forum.pipsinc.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=35117

Did some DD over the week-end results below;

Results of SEC search for PIPS in malaysia;
http://www.ssm.gov.my/name_search.p...=PIPS&cmbstate=
3 valid records found for this search.
90087-H PIPS SDN. BHD. ACTIVE
666404-P PIPS FASHIONS SDN. BHD ACTIVE
663467-A PIPS BISTRO SDN. BHD. ACTIVE
Results of SEC search for PICPAY in malaysia;
1 valid record found for this search
649828-P PICPAY DOT COM SDN. BHD ACTIVE

Results of SEC Search of PIC Capital;
http://www.ssm.gov.my/name_search.p...pital&cmbstate=
2 valid records found for this search
383538-X PIC CAPITAL SDN. BHD. ACTIVE
669563-M PIC CAPITAL VENTURES (M) SDN. BHD. ACTIVE

Results of SEC Search for Pic Trust in NZ
http://www.companies.govt.nz/pls/web/dbssiten.main
Company: 1524340 PIC TRUST LIMITED
Incorporated 15-JUN-2004 Current Status REGISTERED

Thinkfn views are quite opposed to mine, as I have personal friends that have rec'd many times over their investment in PIPS. Even with the delayed Withrawals, one of my friends just put another 20K into PIPS.

Just a matter of perspective I guess, and of course the guarenteed things in life are death and taxes.

"Life a fatal contagious disease"



Posted by: hashlie

Quote:
Originally Posted by forwardone
Legitimate or not this type of Government action can`t be good news for PIPS or it`s investors.

http://www.ssb.state.tx.us/orders/2005/1587.htm

Geoff
Not a big deal really. The order applies to the folks named in the order ie;

IN THE MATTER OF;
PUREINVESTOR.COM INC.,
BRYAN MARSDEN, PIPS INC.,
PIC TRUST LIMITED,
WESTOBY WORKS,
TEAM JOLLYPIPSTER, LLC,
GARY R. WESTOBY,
DEBORAH M. WESTOBY,
AND TORBEN OLE JOLNAES

except for JOLY PIPSSTER which US based, it really is much about nothing.



Posted by: forwardone

The main problem as I see it for PIPS is the slowness of withdrawals.

Quote:
We understand the frustration of members and believe me nobody is more frustrated than we are.

We would love to have the withdrawal situation resolved and up to date, it would make our lives much easier and we would also be able to progress a lot faster with the growth of the businesses.

To those that suggest we use exchangers, this is where the verification process started because of so much fraud and attempted theft, this was not necessarily on the part of the exchangers, but the crooks in the world that attempted to use the system to steal money.

To those that advocate using E-Gold, E-Bullion, EMO etc, we have had too much stolen in the past to ever use these systems again. To the idiot that suggested because we are a Billion dollar organisation we could afford to lose 60K, 100K or a million dollars, get real, we have an obligation to protect the funds - NOT GIVE THEM AWAY TO THIEVES.

Everything that is humanly possible is being done to resolve the situation, but unfortunately it is not all in our hands, well not until the PIC Trust Bank is open.

Having read the posts following Gary's update, I feel very tired and dejected, it is very difficult to spend every waking hour dealing with the problems and then read the attacks against my staff and myself on a 24/7 basis.

These types of problems were always going to arise at some time due to the growth and size of PIPS and although many contingencies were being established, many third party problems arose at a faster rate than we had anticipated which mean't that we did not have everything in place to deal with the problems as smoothly as would have liked.

Please try to understand the situation, remain calm and patient.

WE ARE GETTING THERE, this period will be reviewed later as being the most difficult period in PIPS history but will only serve to strengthen the group.

MUST NOW GET BACK TO DEALING WITH THE BUSINESS.

Bryan
Geoff



Posted by: candy

I have heard that Alaska has joined Texas in investigating PIPS can the SEC/FTC be far behind.
Alaska could give new meaning to freezing an account.



Posted by: forwardone

So B.M. is into fashion I see.

http://thestar.com.my/news/story.as...5272&sec=nation

Quote:
Briton breaks into fashion line


PETALING JAYA: What does an engineer have to do with fashion? Well, it appears that one man’s dream of breaking into the fashion industry might just take off when new label Ronney Baji premieres at KL Fashion Week 2005.

British electrical engineer Bryan Marsden established Pips Fashion in Nilai, Negri Sembilan, last November.

http://thestar.com.my/archives/2005.../n_14ronney.jpg FASHION PARTNERS: Henry (left) and Marsden having a drink after a fashion show in Kuala Lumpur recently.
Its exclusive line under the label Ronney Baji and commercial line Baji will be unveiled for the first time to Malaysians during the Afternoon Designer Showcase on May 5 at the Shangri-La Hotel.

The design team at Pips is led by Sarawakian Ronney Henry. The common thread that binds the creations from Pips is the use of distinctive exotic Eastern fabrics, primarily Malaysian batik, crafted onto Western silhouettes.

Highlights of the Ronney Baji’s Autumn/Winter collection include decorative elements of batik, Malaysian motifs, beadwork and delicate faux fur.

The fashion house has a wide selection of casual, career and evening wear for men and women.

It plans to export its commercial line to the United States, Europe and elsewhere.

According to Marsden, Malaysia provided him the inspiration to dream up a career in fashion.

Marsden, who has now made Malaysia his home, started his career in Britain and was involved in facilities management projects for the KL International Airport in Sepang, and KLCC in Kuala Lumpur. KL Fashion Week, organised by The Star and presented by Tourism Malaysia and L'Oreal Paris, will be held from May 3 to 8.

Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

Quote:
Originally Posted by candy
I have heard that Alaska has joined Texas in investigating PIPS can the SEC/FTC be far behind.
Alaska could give new meaning to freezing an account.

http://www.law.state.ak.us/pdf/cons...lert-042705.pdf

VERY forthright!

Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

A bit more about PIPS and fashion.

http://thestar.com.my/lifestyle/sto...76&sec=features


Quote:
But British-born Bryan Marsden, formerly an electrical engineer, is trying to beat the odds. He figures you can launch a designer into the fashion scene overnight if you have the right smarts.
He plucked four young Malaysian designers out of obscurity and made them his core designing team at his six-month-old fashion company, Pips Fashion.


Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

A ray of hope for PIPsters? Bryan`s message re the bank and Speedywallet.

http://forum.pipsinc.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=45076

Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

Anyone speak Norwegian?

http://pub.tv2.no/nettavisen/okonom...ticle326958.ece#

Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

Someone`s done some of the translation of the 2 articles which were mentioned here.

http://www.thinkfn.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=9512r#9512

Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

What do you think? Apparently PIPS is behind by several months with it`s payouts, and complaints about them are mounting. States issuing `cease and desist` orders against parts of their empire, problems with setting up bank accounts - these are just some of the issues that many members are unhappy about.

This folder is for `Proven, Long Term Paying Programs.` In your view should PIPS remain here, or moved to the General HYIP`s folder?

Vote now in our poll.

Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

A step forward?
Quote:
Hi All,

Just a brief message from Manila, although the e-banking platform is not fully completed yet there is some good new.

The bank will start sending out ALL of the remaining WT's from December tomorrow.

I still have much to do in the Philippines this week and will only be back in Malaysia on Sunday and will then be off to Panama within 2 days.

Gary is continuing the dialogue and setup with VAT and there are also a few more initiatives in the process.

So please to all of those that are posting WHEN, WHY, HOW just bear with us we are a little busy to post everyday, but things are happening.

Bryan
Geoff



Posted by: Paraparaumu

I am a member of Pips and am happy to be a member although a little disappointed in the present difficulties that we have been experiencing for several months. These I put down to a fast expanding business that is having difficulties with people and oganisations outside of Pips (forums, Banks etc)that are not used to this phenomena. I have faith in the present senior Management to overcome these hiccups and supply us members the returns that we are expecting. We are in for the long haul and these problems have not affected us yet, and do not expect them to as they will be rectified by the time we are ready to make changes. We have the right to complain as members but there are many here who are not, and shouldn't. So for those that aren't members join us and eat your words when things come right, and make some money on the side, or don't join and let us work out our own problems. Thanks for reading this



Posted by: chicosan

Quote:
Originally Posted by forwardone
A ray of hope for PIPsters? Bryan`s message re the bank and Speedywallet.

http://forum.pipsinc.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=45076

Geoff

Geoff

The "KEY" to Bryan's update is "WATCH THIS SPACE"!



Posted by: Paraparaumu

Thank you chicosan.
I cound not agree more.
Integrity needs no rules.



Posted by: Cyman

I visit the office last week. A group of us from S'pore, Philippines, Indonesian, and some Malaysian had a meeting with Bryan and Gary 30th April. I can only say PIPS will be around.

Bryan and Gary are doing their best to get everything on track. Hopeful the bank in Cambodia and VAT be up in 2-3 mths.

Members are getting their withdrawal request though it's slow. Bottom-line, we are paid.

Have 3 friends received their checks 2 weeks ago. I have received one, am xpecting 2 more by mth end.

Patient is the key. PIPS will be around for real.

I know some will not believe what I ve said. Time will tell whay's right.

Chhheeeerrrssssssssssssssss....................... . to every PIPSTER here.



Posted by: forwardone

http://www.amatas.com/collections/w...ybajibypips.htm

Another source of income for the PIPS `empire?`

Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

https://www.secure.psc.state.pa.us/...71F8B0F5B16C1DE

Quote:
For Immediate Release: 05/11/2005
Commission Halts Unregistered Activity
By Team JollyPIPSter, LLC and Westoby Works

Harrisburg, PA, 05/11/2005 — To halt the offer and sale of unregistered securities in Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania Securities Commission issued a Summary Order to Cease and Desist against Team JollyPIPSter, LLC (JollyPIPSter) and Westoby Works (Westoby). JollyPIPSter is an entity with an address in Las Vegas, Nevada. Westoby is an entity with an address in Tillamook, Oregon. From in or about December 2004 until the present, JollyPIPSter and Westoby jointly maintained a web site at www.jollypipster.com (Web Site).
At all times material herein, the Web Site contained offering materials (Materials). The Materials state that investors may join one of several different investment opportunities, either individually, or as a member of a pool of investors. These investment opportunities are issued by entities and/or individuals located in Malaysia (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Malaysian Parties”).

One of the Malaysian Parties’ investment opportunities promoted by JollyPIPSter and Westoby is a “2% Plan” (Plan). The Plan purportedly requires a minimum deposit of $450, from which $25 is deducted by the Malaysian Parties as an administrative fee; the remaining $425 is characterized as a “loan” to the Malaysian Parties for 180 days; and the investor purportedly receives a 2% daily return on his investment in the Plan, which is purportedly compounded daily.

In or about March and April 2005, JollyPIPSter and Westoby offered for sale an investment in the Plan to at least one (1) Pennsylvania Resident (PA Resident). The PA Resident was not an “accredited” investor and did not have sufficient knowledge and experience in financial and business matters to be capable of evaluating the merits and risks of the investment. The PA Resident had no pre-existing relationship with JollyPIPSter or Westoby.

The Commission directed JollyPIPSter, Westoby and all affiliates to stop offering or selling the Plan in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in violation of the 1972 Act, and in particular Sections 201 and 301, thereof.

Any further solicitations or sales made by JollyPIPSter, Westoby or their affiliates in Pennsylvania will constitute further violations of the 1972 Act.


Any further solicitations or sales made by these respondents in Pennsylvania will constitute violations of the 1972 Act and the Commission's Orders. Any person who is solicited by or has information about these respondents is asked to immediately notify the Pennsylvania Securities Commission by calling 800-600-0007, or, in Harrisburg: (717) 787-8062, in Pittsburgh: (412) 565-5083 or in Philadelphia: (215) 560-2088.


Alternate formats of this release may be available on request;
call 717/787-1165.

Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

In our recent poll the majority of votes went for leaving this program in the `Proven Programs` folder. We felt that PIPS deserves it`s own folder, so this and other related PIPS threads have been moved here.

Geoff



Posted by: chicosan

Thanks Geoff for not following the naysayer crowd and even though you may not be a PIPS member (yet), you feel comfortable giving PIPS the benefit of the present perceived doubt.



Posted by: forwardone

Apparently the Government Officials spoken about here just turned up unannounced at this PIPS member`s doorstep asking about PIPS (this happened in New Zealand).
http://forum.pipsinc.com/phpBB2/vie...r=asc&start=450

Quote:
Hi Members
This is a letter that i have sent to Bryan

Hi Brian
Hope you and Sharon are well.
This is Les Gardner from Chistchurch NZ (Had a meal at our house)
Bryan i have just had a John Mc Pherson from Companies New Zealand Government,representing the Securities Commission .
They are enquiring about Pips and Pips Trust.They have requested that NewZealanders are not allowed to join Pips as it is allegal for us to do so
as Pips is not a registered security here in NZ.
This is also the 2% program as well
He Said,quote, Loan to pips is a debt security which reuires compliance with the Securities act.
He has also asked me to see my lawyer,as i have made an allegal investment.
So what he is saying that it is allegal for any NZ to Join PIPs
Looks as though we will also have to stop our monthly meetings
He has given me his email address and would like the company to contact him,thats up to you of course
john.Mc pherson@companies.govt.nz

Regards
Les Gardner
Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

Quote:
Originally Posted by forwardone

A bit more on the Alaska situation

http://www.juneauempire.com/stories...050522014.shtml

Quote:
However, it's very unlikely the order will stop PIPS from pitching its plan to Alaskans, said Ed Sniffen, an assistant attorney general who works in the consumer protection unit in Anchorage.
Because the group appears to be based in Malaysia and transacts most of its business over the Internet, there's little Alaska officials can do to stop it. Also, while officials have deemed it illegal for PIPS to sell its securities in Alaska, it is perfectly legal for Alaskans to buy them, Sniffen said.
Geoff



Posted by: Hardlyworkin

Quote:
Originally Posted by forwardone
Apparently the Governemnt Officials spoken about here just turned up unannounced at this PIPS member`s doorstep asking about PIPS (this happened in New Zealand).
http://forum.pipsinc.com/phpBB2/vie...r=asc&start=450

Geoff

Geoff here is a reply that was posted:

"This was also posted as a reply to that post

rahly
VIP Member
Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 456
Location: Canada
Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 3:40 am Post subject:

Definitions taken from http://www.nzx.com/nzxmarket/nzdx/about/debt_types

Types of debt securities.

Bonds
Bonds are debt securities that pay a fixed rate of interest (coupon) and mature at a fixed time in the future. The Government issues bonds, which are called New Zealand Government Stock.

Debentures
Debentures are debt securities issued by companies. Investors are usually protected by a debenture trust deed which imposes constraints on the behaviour of the borrower. Debentures have many of the same characteristics as bonds, and can also be bought and sold on the secondary market.

Capital notes
Capital notes are unsecured subordinated debt. This means that note holders rank behind all other creditors of the company, and in the event of the company going into liquidation, other creditors (such as debenture or bond holders) will receive their money back before the capital note holders.

Capital notes pay a fixed rate of interest for a specified time period, just like bonds and debentures. However at the election date (or maturity date), the holder has the option of holding the notes for a further period at a new interest rate, or converting them to ordinary shares.

If the holder chooses conversion to shares, the company has the option to repay the capital notes in cash. If the company agrees to convert the notes to shares, the face value of the capital note is applied to give a discount to the share price.

Definition taken from http://www.treasury.govt.nz/crownen...rrfp-annexb.pdf

9. In brief:
• a security includes a debt security, equity security and a unit in a unit trust;
• a debt security includes debentures, debenture stocks, bonds, notes, certificates of deposit, convertible notes, and interests or rights declared to be a debt security. Term deposits at a bank are a form of debt security;

Definition taken from http://lawlink.co.nz/lawbiz/corporate/shares.asp

Debt securities are any interests in or rights to be paid money owing by any person. Examples include debentures, debenture stocks, bonds, notes, certificates of deposit and convertible notes.


First Question.

Is PIPS any of the above?

Alan

In response to your question,and this is just my humble opinion,I don't think PIPS OR the 2% is ANY of the above,not the way it is structured...
But I could be wrong."



Posted by: forwardone

More obstacles?

http://www.justpicpay.com/news.html

Quote:
19/07/05
I have recently received an email from Picpay which will affect your orders. We have no clear guidelines as to how or when. We just know that whenever it looks like we were going to be paid, yet another excuse pops up. Today is the latest one.
Thankfully I have other sources of income that earn equally as well and actually pay on time without all the drama. Here is the email that has been sent. The receiver address has been changed.
RE: PAYMENT REQUEST CANCELLATIONS
Date: 19/07/2005 9:16 pm
From: "checkbuyer" <checkbuyer@picpay.com
> (Picpay.Com)
To: <Understandably Pissed Off Merchant>
Reply to: <checkbuyer@picpay.com>
Geoff



Posted by: Hardlyworkin

I'm going to just wait for the anticipated update this week from Bryan and see what he has to say before jumping to any conclusions.



Posted by: Owen Platt

Now a group are attempting to raise funds to take action. go www.getmarsden.com
They seem legitimate and realistic. For a modest sum you can get to join in the legal action. I understand that the funds are held in escrow by the lawyer to avoid any criticism of it being merely a "recovery fund" scam.



Posted by: Hardlyworkin

I wonder what kind of an effect that this is going to really have on Pips.



Posted by: Owen Platt

If they do indeed get a Mareva injunction, this will have the effect of freezing ALL of the companies assets and causing Marsden to open up the books of the company(ies). The problem as I see it is that there is not much information as to where the money is stashed or even where the companies are legally incorporated. My understanding is that the group are being led by a Chartered Accountant and that they will seek injunctions in as many jurisdictions as possible.



Posted by: forwardone

The trouble is, as you say, is where the real money is stashed. If Marsden is a crook then I doubt he`ll leave it hanging around to be easily located. In the world of cyberspace people and money can disappear very easily, witness Mr X and the FLO saga.

The difference I guess with PIPS is that some of the money is tied up in buildings and businesses, and of course B.M. hasn`t exactly shunned publicity so he can be identified if need be.

Geoff



Posted by: Owen Platt

I have a feeling that Marsden's penchant for publicity plus his "investment" in rather odd bricks and mortar businesses may prove to be his undoing. Since none of these can produce 2% per day, effectively it means that he has borrowed money at a rate that makes usury look charitable!
I really wonder just how much money is left anyway.



Posted by: forwardone

But, did he ever really have the need to borrow much, if any, money, or were all these projects completed by simply using members` money to finance them?

Geoff



Posted by: Hardlyworkin

Quote:
Originally Posted by forwardone
But, did he ever really have the need to borrow much, if any, money, or were all these projects completed by simply using members` money to finance them?

Geoff

You are basically loaning the money too Pips and receiveing your 2% daily minus fees etc. I'm sure that the projects were completed by useing the members loaned money. I do agree with Owen that those companies alone cannot generate the 2% daily that is needed.



Posted by: forwardone

Ah yes of course, PIPS views investors` money as `loans` which I`d forgotten about.

Thanks for the clarification, Hardlyworkin.

Geoff



Posted by: Owen Platt

I should clarify that I am neither "pro-PIPS" nor "anti-PIPS" but merely takng a realistic look at the operation. My book would be equally interesting if Marsden turned out to be the most successful investment manager of all time. Sadly, on the evidence that I have seen so far, this seems to be unlikely!



Posted by: Owen Platt

I have received the following from one of my correspondents who is (was?) not only a Merchant but one who had also a substantial financial investment in PIPS.

“A lot of rubbish is posted on this board - so lets put some of the record straight: PIPS offered above any normal rate of return, but because of the volumes of people depositing small sums via bankers checks,credit cards, very quickly became suspect with the merchants services, and the large number of small collections and payments through HSBC in Labuan, made them very nervous, so much so they closed the account. Since then - 2 or 3 other banks have opened accounts then closed them again in very short order. In October, PIPS was "wholly owned by Pureinvestor" and the agreement of the time reflected that. However in one of Bryan's classic moves, the ownership became "wholly owned by Pips Inc in Panama", the agreement changed, and members were not given the option to reject the change and ask for their money back. This in itself was inequitable and poor business practice at the very least. However, as is ever the case with Bryan, he charged ahead with a total lack of concern for his members, failing to keep his promise of payment in 2-3 working days (which incidentally is still the statement on the picpay site)and devestating the people who had trusted him as a result.
Never fear - there is always another promise round the corner, and sure enough, by mid March - 4-5 months after payments stopped, he was able to say that Merchants would get priority payment over members. Why nobody questioned the reason for paying merchants before the long suffering members is a puzzle, but nevertheless, it was so. I'm informed that the first payment appeared to go through in reasonable time for merchants, the second was slower following a bank account closure, and thereafter it has been dribbling out with growing delays. All this while, virtually no money was being paid to ordinary members. You can see this from reports all over this and other forums. This promise of paying merchants quickly, built into a rush of new merchant accounts. Obviously, if there was any way for people to get access to the money that Bryan had promised - they were going to take it - and many new merchants sprang up to take advantage of the pressure. As is always the case when an opportunity arises, people will try and seize the initiative to benefit. That Bryan had himself created this pressure by failing to meet his promises, seems to have been conveniently forgotten.
More delays were built in to the system with excuses about verification - which has absolutely nothing to do with payment processes. Any verification is a management responsibility which should be applied BEFORE any transfer from a picpay account took place. This responsibility was and is signally lacking in the company. I can understand why this thread was started. I believe that Bryan in his normal cavalier, insensitive and unethical approach to business, DELETED transactions from the Merchants accounts in Picpay's records. He did this without advance notice or subsequent rationale, without proper accounting controls and without any audit of the procedure. Those merchants who had perforce to maintain a reconciliation with what is reported to be an appalling bit of software were now left with "numbers" that they had in their books - but no longer matched their transactions in their account in Picpay. If there was ANY audit of value in place, or any checks and balances on Bryan, he would rightly have been fired immediately that oversight found this incompetence in book-keeping while he was responsible for prudent management of the businesses. At the end of the day, ANYBODY who deletes book-keeping transactions is potentially open to accusations of fraud, and Bryan is no exception. That the system even ALLOWS deletion of records is indicative of poor database design and extremely poor internal control. Further, Bryan created the Merchant phenomenon, as a result of his inability to pay members and his promise to pay Merchants immediately and in preference to members, but as soon as it looked like they were benefitting from sales (and requiring unexpectedly large sums of money), he decided that those markets were ones Pips and Picpay were involved in - and they didn't want the competition from mere Merchants.
Bryan has failed to realise that every business has competitors - some of whom supply and are supplied by their competitors too. Here was a case of saying "I can't pay my members - so neither will you be allowed to provide any benefit - and anyway I can't pay you so I'll cancel the promise to pay". The proposed re-verification of merchants leads on to another problem that Bryan has. He cannot delegate. Every successful businessman is a good delegator, employing better people than himself and letting them do the work. Bryan does the reverse, he employs people he cannot or will not delegate to, so by definition he is a second grade manager. (A self evident fact bearing in mind the last 10 months). Re-verification of merchants requiring the removal of priviliges across the board and the requirement to prove that you are old established and the right kind of business for Bryan, is at the very least, puerile - ESPECIALLY as a lot of merchants were created BECAUSE of Bryans promise of prompt payment. Bryan has a Picpay Marketing Manager, to vet and approve Merchants. If the Manager can't do his job - train him or fire him, and then gradually review business partners to resolve your perceived difficulties. NOT Bryan's approach however. His approach is to remove ANY cash outgoing from Picpay while leaving unresolved transactions for members in the Merchants Accounts.
TRIPLE WHAMMY! The Merchants can't get paid, the members don't get what they ordered, and the members Picpay is out of their control. Those members who DID not buy from merchants, can probably expect a payment to maintain the illusion that picpay pays. (after all there’s not much left after everyone tried to get value for their Picpay via merchants) - Those who DID buy from merchants can whistle. What a fiasco the "Best Payment Method on the Internet - Picpay " has become. WHAT A MASTERPIECE of deceitful dealing.
Bryan I salute you for finding the most obnoxious, unethical and devious way to treat your Members and Merchants that you possibly could devise.”



Posted by: forwardone

Interesting! The more I read the more doubts I have.

Whatever happened to the bank accounts that Bryan was supposed to be setting up some time ago, was it in Latvia, Lithuania or somewhere in Eastern Europe, can`t remember exactly.

Geoff



Posted by: Owen Platt

Some time ago I posted my assessment of the situation with the PIPS group of companies. My initial scepticism of their activities was based upon the generally accepted impossibility of sustainable returns of 2% per trading day on the loaned funds, on the serious lack of payments to a good many of the members over a period of several months and on the various "banking problems" being cited as the reason for this.

I asked for information, positive or negative, on the matter, as information from the company itself was not forthcoming.

On being re-posted to the then extant PIPS forum, it was greeted with a barrage of pointless invective, only one "Pipster" being courteous enough to E-Mail me with his opinion.

There was, however, a good deal of input from those who had received either little or nothing in return for their loan.

Since then, the situation has gone from strange to bizarre, perhaps starting with the closure of the PIPS forum, effectively isolating members from any official channel of communication, the shutting down of many merchant accounts, problems with the PicPay arrangement, closure of a 5 year investment programme and serious difficulties for members wishing to access information. Even more strange is the lack of information from management concerning the multi-various affairs of the company, affairs which must be of growing concern to those who have as yet to benefit from the monies they have placed in the hands of Mr. Marsden.

PIPS have solicited and accepted funds from members of the public and are thus, under the normal terms of legitimate business, expected to provide an explanation and accounting of the borrowed funds. These explanations do not appear to be forthcoming and this would be more than adequate grounds for the launching of a legal action by an investor or investors.Many of the statements made by officers of the company and in the company literature are open to question.

Whilst only the opening up of the audited books of the company can resolve, once and for all, the true situation, on balance it would appear that PIPS and its associated enterprises constitute nothing more than a grandiose fraudulent investment scheme. Only Mr. Marsden can prove otherwise.



Posted by: Hardlyworkin

I would have to agree with you Owen. Most distressing in the lack of communication and updates from Bryan we were supposed to get an update this week.



Posted by: forwardone

Since this is doing the forum rounds I`ll post it here. Make of it what you will though.

Quote:
"From what can be gathered from people very close to the source:

1. monies will be coming through from a trading platform (one of those huge ones paying 6% if you invest $10m or more). This will provide short-term relief
2. bank licence, although it will take a year or 2 to be profitable
3. restructure of PIPS program
4. a top UK corporate specialist has come out of retirement to help PIPS
5. most importantly, the banks and trading platforms are holding on to $10s of millions under Patriot and other acts. This is a reason why we are not being paid
6. only merchant's with 4 years experience in business will be permitted to continue to be a merchant.

We also know that some are frustrated with BM because he has his own casual style and they have a much more structured approach to business."

Geoff



Posted by: Hardlyworkin

Unfortunately unless it comes from Byans mouth/hand it is all specualtion. No on really knows what is going to happen next except Bryan.



Posted by: Owen Platt

As you (and I) say: it is up to Marsden to clarify the situation. However, I see this posting trots out the old scammers excuse that it is due to the Patriot Act that monies can not be disbursed. The Patriot Act has no effect upon the transfer of funds worldwide. It does however require that banks perfom rather more diligent due diligence than in the past and that they are liable for severe penalties for failure to report suspicious transactions. They have no mandate under this or any other act to "freeze" an account although they may place funds in a suspense account pending enquiries into their source.



Posted by: Hardlyworkin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Owen Platt
As you (and I) say: it is up to Marsden to clarify the situation. However, I see this posting trots out the old scammers excuse that it is due to the Patriot Act that monies can not be disbursed. The Patriot Act has no effect upon the transfer of funds worldwide. It does however require that banks perfom rather more diligent due diligence than in the past and that they are liable for severe penalties for failure to report suspicious transactions. They have no mandate under this or any other act to "freeze" an account although they may place funds in a suspense account pending enquiries into their source.

You are correct Owen the banks only have to verify that the monies are legitimate and are not going to be used for terrorism. Once that is done everything should run as normal.



Posted by: Hardlyworkin

This was posted in a recent newsletter that I received:

"A substantial restructurization of PIPS, Inc can be expected soon in order to improve the company's performance in terms of withdrwal requests. As a result, funds will be coming directly from the company's own trading platform in order to simplify the process of sending interest payments to the program's investors. Upon the introduction of this change, only merchants with a four-year experience in business will be invited for further co-operation with PIPS, Inc."

Right now still speculation until an update comes out from Bryan though.



Posted by: Owen Platt

I note that there is a resounding silence from Mr. Marsden. Also that he did not append his name to the last "update." One would have thought that with all the rumour and speculation amongst his "investors" (for want of a better word), he would have been eager to clarify the situation.



Posted by: forwardone

If this is a true story then there`s something rotten in a small monastry town in County Meath, Ireland, called Kells.

It`s rather a long story but tells the account of a girl (I`m assuming it`s a girl by her username) and how she was swindled out of a couple of thousand Euros, and how others in that vicinity have been swindled too.

Here`s her account, it sounds fairly realistic, and is quite detailed in her version of events. As always though in this arena it`s also good to display some healthy skeptism when reading such things.

http://talkgold.com/forum/showthrea...41&page=1&pp=10

Geoff



Posted by: Owen Platt

I have two contacts in Kells who confirm the truth of the story. I even have her name.



Posted by: forwardone

There does seem to be some credence in the original account as others who say they are from Kells are posting to tell of their support for the poster.

This is a comment made by someone in that area who didn`t join PIPS.
Quote:
You’re suggestions of contacting the police is interesting, but apparently one of the founding members in Kells is a member of the Garda Siochana and that lent it credence. I passed by the house of one of the original recruiters yesterday. Its very nice! Lucky him! But I wouldn’t like to be in his shoes.
When people I knew invested in PIPS, I looked at their website and knew straight away it was a pyramid but my warnings fell on deaf ears. I put all the information I had together and emailed it to RTE. They weren’t interested and in the meantime, PIPS continued recruiting in Kells. I

Geoff



Posted by: forwardone

Quote:
THE CONSUMERS Association of Ireland (CAI) last night issued a warning over a get rich pyramid-style scheme believed to be operating in Co Meath.

The People In Profit System (PIPS) scheme has been the subject of alerts in two US states and in Australia with reports yesterday that a significant number of people in the Co Meath town of Kells had signed up to it. One person who contacted the Irish Independent claimed he had lost €5,000 and was now anxious to alert people that they were being scammed.

The scheme, which has its own dedicated website, claims it is "designed to ensure members achieve the financial independence they desire".

The site says "members can take comfort in the fact that they will be providing urgently needed aid to underdeveloped countries and will also be assisting in the building of a sustainable world environment".

Under the scheme investors are asked to "loan" $460 to the company. From this payment $35 is kept as an account set up fee with the remaining $425 characterised as a loan to the company for 180 days.

PIPS agrees to pay the investor with interest under a schedule depending on the type of plan the investor chooses. The interest payments on the loan can be as high as 5000 pc with a $460 loan purported to return over $8,000.

However with US and Australian officials warning that the scheme was essentially an "illegal Ponzi scheme", concerns are now being raised here. Named after US swindler Charles Ponzi, the US authorities said the scheme used money from later investors to pay early investors.

Inevitably, they said, the scheme collapses and the only people who consistently make money are the promoters who set the scheme in motion.

The Co Meath investor, who contacted the Irish Independent, claimed that the scheme did work initially but soon the payback dried up and his €5,000 investment has disappeared.

Chief executive of the Consumers Association of Ireland (CAI) Dermott Jewell said the reality was that reports of this scheme were just "variations on a theme" of schemes from which few, if any people, actually benefited.

While Mr Jewell said the number of these so-called "Pyramid schemes" were on the decline and the CAI had not received any reports of the PIPS scheme to date, he said the fact that this scheme was the subject of alerts in the US and Australia should put Irish consumers off getting involved in them.

"If it looks too good to be true, stay away. This is not buyer beware, it's consumer beware. It's a scheme aimed at making money, not necessarily for the consumer," he said.

Kathy Donaghy


Geoff



Posted by: Hardlyworkin

They have also already closed Pipstrust, I wonder what will be next.



Posted by: forwardone

And still no bank account.
Quote:
" Please understand that whatever you get from others which is not officially
from us is untrue or just a rumors.

Regarding withdrawal situation, you also aware that we are currently have a
problem with the bank site. We have bulk of thousand withdrawal request.
As you know that we have over than 80,000 members and just imagine if all of
them request a withdrawal. Most of them request a withdrawal with a large
amount and just a few of them request with a small amount.

You also need to understand that we still don't have our own bank. What I
mean is our own bank is still under progressing. With the bank that we are
using right now of course they cannot all the time concentrate on resolving
our problem because they also have other members need to handle.

In future when we have our own bank I'll guarantee that everything will be
solved. Just wait and be highly patient. As staff in this company and also
close with Mr. Bryan, I believe with his effort the company will not simply
go down. Of course as a CEO he will not simply let his company close and he
has his own value.

The company is still strong if not why are we still here? If the company is
not good why we are still answer your question? That is not because of the
salary that we get but it is because of the company. Bare in mind that all
members will get their money but still have to wait. If you don't believe
me please visit PIPS forum and you can see latest update from Mr. Bryan.
The other thing is Mr. Bryan is not liar. If he is a liar why he open other
business and very near with PIPS and PICPAY office? If he is a liar why he
is still around?

I really hope that you will satisfy with my explanation. You have to know
that people can make a negative story about other person even though that
particular person is good. In other word is we cannot stop other people's
mouth to talk.

Please forward this message to others and thank you for your understanding
and concern towards our company.

-Rizal-
Thank You.

Regards,
Member's Account Department
Picpay.Com ___________

Geoff



Posted by: Hardlyworkin

I saw the same posted over at TG and of course it got beat up.



Posted by: DontBefooled

I suppose this is par for the course! Go to rolclub now and you`re met with a big ad for......Greenzap, not a processor with the best of reputations.

Quote:
YOUR SUPPORT IS HIGHLY APPRECIATED. THIS REVENUE WILL BE USED TO PAY ROLCLUB BILLS AND HELP US TO GROW AS A SITE.



Marek, you are SO transparent.



Posted by: forwardone

Obviously his other advertising revenues aren`t quite enough. Why I don`t know because he must be raking in an absolute fortune from them. He must have a very expensive lifestyle, a case of `make hay while the sun shines` I think.



Posted by: darcieP

http://www.greenzapscam.com/ is an interesting site discussing GreenZap.

Marek must be making a LOT of money from pushing this GZ down PIPSters throats as incessantly as he is.



Posted by: DontBefooled

He`s even sending begging e-mails out!
Quote:
HI all

Sometimes i do get sad by the lack of responce from you guys.

We do our best to make this site grow,
bring you the info from pips to all other progarms.

Have been keeping you all Fine Members updated for 6 months.

But when we ask for Something that does not cost you 1 Cent out off your pocket,
the most go silent??

Here is your chance to show me that you care. And could support Rolclub, and
also bee making $50 USD while you support us, and it wont cost you anything.

Go to this link please and read it all so you understand.

I do request that all members (16000) do this.

http://www.rolclub.com/showthread.php?t=4487


Regards

Marek
Admin





Posted by: forwardone

Marek`s getting a bit hot under the collar over the Greenzap issue.

http://www.talkgold.com/forum/showt...?t=49310&page=3


Quote:
Today, 11:40 AM
Marek
Investor Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 189

Re: Sorry Marek - No Help From Us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
Originally Posted by dogman
Marek, you are trying to scam people with a scam payment processor. You sure didn't do any DD on greenzap, and you never answer anybody's questions.

Like 1. Why do you need money from Greenzap or other programs when you already make money from the advertising? TG only makes money from ads and does just fine.

It looks like you are trying to rip people off, so I have a right to tell them that, and this forum is free speech - unlike yours where if anybody asks you any questions, you ban them. Go back to Rolclub, Marek and stay there.



WHAT I NEED MONEY FOR IS NON OF YOUR CONSIRN!

YOU PUNKS GOT OUR GOOGLE ADS STOPPED! GREENZAP REPLACES THAT!

TAKE THIS FOR AN ANSWER, OR SWALOW IT. I DONT CARE!

AND YOUR FULL OFF S...!




Posted by: darcieP

Rolclub now has a separate folder for Greenzap. GZ really must be making it worthwhile for Marek to go to all this trouble with all the cheerleading he`s doing.

Oh, and any member who tries asking `unwanted` questions, or offers any criticism of GZ soon finds their posts magically disappearing.



Posted by: DontBefooled

Irony, or just plain lies? At the top of the banner ads at rolclub appears this-
Quote:
Rolclub does not endorse ads

And the biggest of all the banners says something like:- Support Rolclub by joining......Greenzap



Posted by: forwardone

Quote:
Originally Posted by DontBefooled
Irony, or just plain lies? At the top of the banner ads at rolclub appears this-

And the biggest of all the banners says something like:- Support Rolclub by joining......Greenzap


That tells a story.



Posted by: DontBefooled

Well Marek must be making a lot from pushing Greenzap. Is the last comment saying that although B.M. announced the launch of the new Lotto about 12 hours ago the URL still hasn`t been made available?



Quote:
Happy New year to All Rolclub Members. We are closing down the forum for the next few hours. This is an opportunity, for ROLclub to update our system and server. Bryan has signed up on Greenzap. You can use his greenzap id to signup under him if you would like to use this payment processor.http://www.greenzap.com/pipsaid. (cut and paste this link in a new browser). Note for Bryan, please send us the link for the lotto to admin@rolclub.com .







Posted by: forwardone

That notice has been updated since with this addition. At this moment RolClub is still closed.
Quote:
Note to members. Please dont email me asking when we open. We open as fast as the server is fine. I will email all Rolclub's 16200 members the link to Bryans lotto matrix,as soon as when we get it from Bryan. Regards Marek Admin Rolclub.com ------------------------------------------------ Just checked the email at 0640 AM Central E. time, and still no e-mail from Bryan. We will not open the site before another 6- 8 hours because of our server. Site is estimated back at: (1 Jan) Us time : 06.00-08.00AM. EU time : 12:00-1400 PM. Australia:19:00-2100 PM.




Posted by: Owen Platt

The greenZap site now carries the following:
Bryan Marsden has invited you to join GreenZap. Click the button below to sign up and receive $25 in WebCash and an extra $25 in WebCash on behalf of Bryan Marsden.



Posted by: forwardone

Oh what a tangled web we weave. Marek and B.M. are using one another for their own ends, and at the moment PIPS is still providing plenty of income for Marek through Rolclub.



Posted by: forwardone

Quote:
Originally Posted by Owen Platt
The greenZap site now carries the following:
Bryan Marsden has invited you to join GreenZap. Click the button below to sign up and receive $25 in WebCash and an extra $25 in WebCash on behalf of Bryan Marsden.

I think at one time it was $50 for signing up, or was that for doing some sort of upgrade. From what this announcement says it looks like the $50 is still the same, but now they are trying to make it look as though half of it has come from the charitable BM?



Posted by: hawk

I an sick and tired of ignorant people that posting nonsense without first learning what is all about.


It looks to me that come people hers are just looking for more garbage to post only to disturb and point something bad without any intelligent meanings.

Get you life and stop picking on somebody you have no idea what you are talking about.

You guys know who I am referring to.

I hope is much topic to discuss than bad mouth somebody.



Posted by: Owen Platt

Some Due Diligence on GreenZap that may be worth pursuing for those contemplating joining.

GreenZap is the brainchild of Damon Westmoreland, a well-known operator in the fraudulent investment and pyramid scheme business. His most notorious effort was that of Caruba International, a major offshore swindle that was shut down by the regulators in 2001 after many had lost their money. Claiming to be based in Aruba, it was in fact, rather unwisely, operated from Florida.
His other schemes have included The PayLine, MyPaySystems, SlickDeals and Mazumah, all MLM’s that seem to have failed, although only after having separated people from their wallets with a degree of success.
In view of his track record, he appears to have appointed others to front GreenZap for him, a Mr. Solkin and a Mr. Bernstein, but it seems unlikely that he will have abandoned his modus operandii. A “Google” search for “Damon Westmoreland” is recommended.
Prenez garde.



Posted by: Rog

At first, GreenZap’s domain registration was by proxy

(no legit company does this) and then they changed it to where it was

no longer by proxy. When they did this, for one day it had the same

phone number as other scam companies of Damon Westmoreland’s

(jet99, card global, and mazumah).

On the next day they changed it, after it was discussed on a forum how

it was the same phone number. Oddly enough, they still left the mailing

address as that of a rented mailbox in a grocery store in San Diego.

The most recent press release of GreenZap’s, announcing their CEO,

lists Linda Murphy as their contact person. Interestingly enough, this

is the same person that the San Diego’s Better Business Bureau

has on file as being the VP of Marketing for Mazumah.



Posted by: DontBefooled

I doubt if any reputable processor would actually want anything to do with PIPS or rolclub. The fact that GreenZap does should tell you something about their own honesty.



Posted by: DontBefooled

I thought this was a very good post made at another forum which blows a lot of arguments apart which are made by PIPSters about PIPS ever coming back.

http://www.hyipdiscussion.com/pips-...forum-up-7.html

Quote:
1. HBFC Bank did not cause Bryan to stop making payments. They asked him to change processors. If you have nothing to hide, and are a legitimate business as claimed by BM, this is an easy task. So what you are asking everyone to believe is that HBFC Bank is the culprit for PIPS not paying. But wait a minute, I thought it was BNM confiscating the servers and computers that prevented PIPS from paying? Of course that action was 9 months after PIPS stopped paying, but don't let that fact get in your way. Yes, BM did change processors.

2. Legitimate companies are investigated every day, and they don't have their computers or servers confiscated. You can investigate a company without having to have these items confiscated. As stated, it is done every day. Only companies that are under investigation for having committed a criminal activity have this done. Ask Blake Prater at Wellspring. You remember him? He was BM's mentor. I will come back to him in a minute.

3. Bryan said in his press releases that PIPS was a legitimate company and was authorized to do business in every country they operated. He even went on to say they had filed all the necessary papers with the SEC here in the U.S. and were authorized to do business. WRONG. I will go into depth on this later as well.

4. If you have your computers and servers confiscated, you are taken down. If you can't conduct business you are shut down. If you want to play a semantic word game here then we will use shut down. Shut down or taken down is still the same result.

5. You can check a company's database without having to confiscate servers or computers. That's what internal investigations are for. It happens every day. Only companies that end up being scams have this action taken against them.

6. Payments stopped in late December, except for a few just prior to the convention to keep the wolves at bay. But, from that time forward, no payments were made. This was least another 7 months before BNM entered the picture. Bryan also said he had changed his processor, so this could not have been the issue with non-payment.

7. Banks, nor Prosecutors shut down, close down, or take down legitimate businesses. Why would they? Remember, BM has stated PIPS was legitimate.

8. As far as my math skills are concerned, they are quite good thank you. The examples I used were from BM himself, not mine. So, let's do the math one more time. If you have a 2% rate of return daily, have an average investment of $1,000, and multiply that times the number of PIPSTERS (BM's figures as to the number of PIPS members) of 800,000 (he actually claimed more), your annual rate of retun is 2,400%. In just 2 short years, this is more than 1/3 of the world's Total GNP. Don't you just love the compounding interest feature, and math being an exact science?!
BM boasted that if someone put $10,000 in the 2% program, that in just 4 short years this would exceed $300 Billion. His words, not mine. AW, the power of compounding interest. Maybe you should take a refresher course in math.

9. As far as the Lotto is concerned, the math I used was directly from ROLClub. I used their figures to come up with the matematical results. Don't blame me if you don't like the outcome. I didn't provide the numbers, I just did the math. AW, that pesky math issue again.

10. Before you go off the deep end, let me also clarify a couple of other issues for you. I am a member of ROLCLub, and I did invest in PIPS. My investment was not a personal investment, but as part of an investment group. None of us put money into PIPS that we could not lose. Sorry to say, many who did invest did not follow that cardinal rule of investing. Had this been a personal investment, I would have done a thorough DD before investing. I only just recently started really investigating PIPS, and knew what a total hype everyone had fallen for. I will agree this was my personal assessment, but I am entitled to my opinion. What I find totally incredulous is that I am not allowed to ask questions about how MY money is invested. If I do, I am being negative. I am just to trust that BM will save the day, and I am not to rock the boat. Sorry, but when it comes to MY money, I have every right to rock the boat.

11. At the Las Vegas Convention, BM stated that PIPS was licensed in every country they did business. He even made a point to say that PIPS had applied in the U.S. from the SEC to conduct business in the U.S. This is a bold face lie. PIPS is not registered in any state of the United States, and the SEC has no record of ever having received any papers from PIPS registering to conduct business in the U.S.. Now to the Cease and Desist orders.

12. There are currently 15 states, I say currently as 10 more may be issuing such an order shortly, who have issued a Cease and Desist order against PIPS, and anyone promoting PIPS. That is FACT. Another FACT: There are currently 3 trials being conducted in the United States of promoters of PIPS by the SEC for: Selling unregistered securities, Bank Fraud, Wire Fraud, running a Ponzi scheme, and several other lesser charges. They face fines up to $500k, having to reimburse up to 2 times the amount of every person they had invest in PIPS, plus prison time. Then once the Feds are done, the states are ready to also bring charges against them. Now since you, Blueshark, are such a close personal friend of BM, I am sure you will want to come to their aid and help them with their trial. I know they would love to have you come in, or BM for that matter, and show everyone just how legitimate PIPS is. Never mind BM forgot to get approval first. I am sure they will overlook that technicality, and just be thrilled to learn PIPS is legitimate. The only reason the other 10 have not issued their orders yet, is because PIPS has been technically shut down, and thus no-one here in the states can invest. If BNM had not acted, these 10 would have already joined the others in issuing such an order. The Federal and state authorities are going after the promoters of PIPS here in the U.S., and I really don't think any of these will go down without turning states evidence against PIPS. So much for your statement that PIPS never advertised here in the U.S., so no action could be taken, and they have nothing. I understand how confused you could have been on this point.

13. Let's move to the Lotto for just a moment, as I want to address just 3 issues: First, I did not say the Lotto was not on the internet. I said this Lotto is illegal in 1/3 of the world's countries. Big difference. Kind of hard to hit the dollar figures forecast if you have so many who cannot play the lotto. Second, go to any major countries lotto site, and you will see their license displayed on their website. You have to be licensed to run a lottery, and this license has to be displayed. Not only that, they have a real physical address, phone numbers, E-mail addresses (not a yahoo address either), and all the principal's of the lotto committe listed. They also have their Board of Directors listed, with their addresses and contact information. In addition they show a total history of all winners and their winnings. They also have a FAQ page, and they even have a scam page alerting people to fraudulent Lotto E-mail scams going around. Just like any business requiring a license, all display their license so people know they are dealing with a legitima