|
Originally Posted by forwardone
.I still maintain that even if they aren`t found guilty of any wrongdoing the money can no longer be there.
|
|
Originally Posted by golddust
This would be evidence of 'wrongdoing', IMO.
|
|
Berita Harian Online - Ilmu & Maklumat (Malaysia) s3-gentoo.emedia.com.my Finally, a report in the malay national paper. Here's the translation. (1) The Seremban Sessions court allows the transfer of 7 seperate money laundering charges on BM from the KL Sessions court to its court. The decision to transfer the charges was made by Judge Alaudeen Ismail after no objections were made DPP, Muhammad Saifuddin Hashim Musaimi. (2) Marsden will face 57 charges, while his wife Phan Sew Ken, a Malaysian faces 48 charges of money laundering totaling to RM45.9million (about USD12.4 million) (3) The court has set January 4th 2007 for next mention of the case. The accused were represented by their respective lawyers. More of the same news reported in Utusan Malaysia. Utusan Malaysia Online - Mahkamah |
|
Originally Posted by dollarsblog
I wonder which was bigger as far as members, solidinvestment or pips or right now swisscash(another malaysian scam) ?
|
|
The Trial has Begun!!! After several false starts and 2 years of waiting, it HAS started. Summary: Prosecution calling 5 witnesses, 2 have testified so far. Tendering evidence now resuming on a very monotonous pace but it promises attentive highlights we anticipate...... |
|
Originally Posted by forwardone
I don`t get it. I see over at RC that they are asking for donations toward the trial.
Is that FOR the prosecution against the Marston`s, or in SUPPORT of the Marston`s? Either way, it seems to me to be throwing good money after bad... |
|
Originally Posted by golddust
The trial should be interesting, I doubt it will last very long. A death sentence is a punishment that does not fit the crime. Consider all the thieves in the failed Wall Street investment firms and around the globe. Is it any wonder the Marsdens are revered by some? In comparison, they are small time crooks.
|
|
A brief analysis of Day 1. Prosecution entered more than 50 documents into evidence, and called 3 of their 5 witnesses. Defense is that it is everyone else's fault, not BM and Sharon's. Day 2 will have more documents entered into evidence, and the other 2 witnesses called, then the Defense will present their case. I do not see this ending in 2 days. Second trial is slated for all of next week (5 days), and this trial will have to conclude after this trial is finished. Just too much ground to cover in triaal one to complete in 2 days. Will be interesting to see when they will schedule the conclusion of this first trial. |
|
Originally Posted by okosh
Their country so it's their rules...
|
|
Originally Posted by golddust
okosh, can you provide a link for your source of information regarding this trial?
Thanks. |